Can’t buy me love…or jurisdiction

can't buy jurisdiction

Can’t Buy Me Love, or Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction Family Law

Jurisdiction is complicated.

More so when people move around.

Kelly Rutherford is prime example.  Over 3 years ago, her divorce case was filed in California.  After a LONG trial, the Judge issued orders that the kids were to live in Monaco (citing, amongst other things, the fact that Father’s visa is revoked and cannot come to the USA).

So why did California lose jurisdiction 3 years later?

It’s true that under the UCCJEA (Uniform Child Custody and Jurisdiction Act) (in California it’s codified in Family Code 3400 et seq), once a home state issues orders, it will retain “continuing, exclusive jurisdiction”….unless 2 exceptions.  And the exception here is that NONE of the parties or children reside in California.

In Rutherford’s case, I believe California lost jurisdiction because it was determined that neither of the parties or children presently resided in California.

Jurisdiction is a very complicated legal issue.  Make sure you consult a legal professional before trying to battle this on your own.

Here is my contribution to Legal Talk Network on the jurisdictional issues of Kelly Rutherford’s case.

Have a case like this?

Family matters are extremely personal, and it is important for us to know details of your case before giving advice. Each case is different, and it is important to find an attorney you trust. To arrange an appointment, please call us at (626) 765-5767 between 8:30am – 5:00pm, Mondays to Fridays, or fill out the form below.

Schedule a Consultation